Facebook Pixel

Is the Single Payer Option Off the Table?

 
Rate This

We’ve been watching President Obama walk back from a number of his campaign promises lately. And now we are watching the health care industry back off from the premise of the May 11th Summit, which was a commitment to reform. First, the insurance industry said they hadn’t really guaranteed the $2 trillion in savings, and now they are even more hesitant to commit to any changes. Frank Luntz has already circulated the talking points, and it’s the same old stuff, but couched in way more subtle terms.

Worse, the entire single payer option, favored by many people in the U.S., is off the table, and proponents who have attempted to lobby for it in Congress at hearings have been ejected and arrested. The last I heard, Sen. Baucus, co-chair of the effort to reform health care, has tried to avoid even talking to the single payer advocates.

We are well aware of the need for compromise in legislation. But if Obama doesn’t show some leadership here, health care reform will go the way of Hillary Clinton’s last try at it in 1993, only with a more pleasant demeanor on the part of the opposition — in line with Obama’s new push for civil discourse. But what’s the use of civil discourse if nothing changes? We will lose more providers, because they are now demoralized and powerless to control the system they work in. We will lose more patients, because younger people with chronic illnesses who can’t get treatment will begin to die off. Economically, we will suffer because we won’t have a healthy work force. Do we want to look like Africa?

The one encouraging piece of news is that Teddy Kennedy’s cancer seems to be in remission, and he is expected back in the Senate after the Memorial Day recess. I hope he is there to throw down the gauntlet and make these enators fall in line so that we get a meaningful change.

We can’t afford not to do this. Medicare is going broke, Part D isn’t working for most people, large numbers of unemployed and underemployed adults are uninsured, emergency rooms are overwhelmed, and only SCHIP, the children’s health insurance plan, seems to be working.

We are not advocating for single payer, necessarily, but the American public needs to get real about rationing. We have it now, only with much more stringent criteria: you can have health care if you can afford it. Our system now is “irrational rationing.” Rational rationing would probably be more welcome!

And how about some health education? Some prevention? Some individual responsibility? Maybe even a system like the Community Health Centers’ sliding fee schedules? Almost anything is better than what we now have, which the entrenched industry interests are trying to preserve.

Add a Comment1 Comments

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous

I am not even sure i am a proponent of single payer,

but forcing people with point of a gun 'mandates' to buy into the Medical Insurance Mafia scam without it, is a travesty & will not be borne.

Baucus is a bought off sleazebag [2 mil last year alone] who just got an earful from angry Montanans last week about what he has been up to.

He is also one of the prominent authors of the Medicare drug benefit, which was pure corporate welfare for drug companies, again at the expense of this nation, its economy & taxpayers.

Either fix healthcare with single payer or leave the medical mess [aka system] alone.

I do agree with you that people need to become acquainted with prevention, rationing & some common sense on the subject.

It is the complete mental disconnect between use of services & the expenses involved that have allowed unrestrained escalating costs.
People think insurance is some magic cover-all, until they actually get ill & denied coverage. Only Congress gets gold-plated coverage.

The first & most important health care is personal self-care. Starting by educating one's self & then acting upon that with feedback based on one's experience.

George

June 3, 2009 - 8:23am
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy
Add a Comment

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.

Political Issues

Get Email Updates

Health Newsletter

Receive the latest and greatest in women's health and wellness from EmpowHER - for free!