Facebook Pixel

For Proper Brain Function, Cells Need to Keep the Beat

By
 
Rate This

(Great Neck, N.Y. - May 26, 2009) — Research led by NARSAD Investigator Karl Deisseroth, M.D., Ph.D., of Stanford University Medical Center, suggests that brain cells need to follow specific rhythms for proper brain functioning, and that these rhythms don't appear to be working correctly in schizophrenia and autism.

In studies published in Nature and Science, the researchers demonstrate that precisely tuning the oscillation frequencies of certain neurons can affect how the brain processes information and implements feelings of reward.

"A unifying theme here is that of brain rhythms and 'arrhythmias'," stated Dr. Deisseroth, an associate professor of bioengineering and of psychiatry and behavioral sciences. Senior author of the studies, Dr. Deisseroth received a NARSAD Young Investigator grant in 2005 and was elected to NARSAD’s Scientific Council last year.

An arrhythmia is what cardiologists call a seriously irregular heartbeat. The new findings suggest that, like the cells that keep the beat of the heart, certain brain cells can orchestrate oscillations that ultimately help govern behavior of other cells that are guided by those rhythms.

In the Nature study, published online on April 26 along with a companion paper from MIT, Dr. Deisseroth's team focused on neurons in mice that produce a protein called parvalbumin. Some researchers have suspected that these neurons drive gamma brain waves that oscillate at a frequency of 40 times a second (or Hertz), and that these waves might affect the flow of information in the brain. This could not previously be proved because no one could selectively control the neurons and see the resulting effect on the information flow, or oscillations.

"This has been a fundamental mystery. We have these cells that could be crucially involved in high-level, complex information processing and we see these oscillations that are happening, but people don't really know how to put all this together," Dr. Deisseroth said. "But this is exactly the kind of thing now that we can address using optical methods."

Dr. Deisseroth's group has developed a technique, called optogenetics, in which specific cells can be genetically engineered to be controlled by pulses of visible light. The team did this with parvalbumin neurons in mice and found that by exciting or inhibiting them, they could produce or suppress gamma waves and see a marked change in the "bit rate," or quantity of information, flowing through brain circuits.

"What we found is that if you crank the parvalbumin neurons down, you see fewer of these 40-Hertz oscillations. If you crank them up, you see more of these gamma oscillations," Dr. Deisseroth said. "That's the first real proof that these neurons are indeed involved in generating these gamma brain waves."

The team then found they could quantify in bits the effect of oscillations on information flow through neural circuits, and that the oscillations specifically enhance information flow among different cell types in the frontal cortex.

"The final outcome of this,” Dr. Deisseroth said, ”is that parvalbumin neurons and gamma oscillations work together to enhance the flow of real information in the brain."

The potential link to disease comes from the fact that in autism, the gamma oscillations appear to be present at the wrong intensity, while in schizophrenia, there appear to be too few parvalbumin neurons.

"This is a new perspective relevant to both schizophrenia and autism, conditions in which information comes in but it isn't necessarily processed correctly," Dr. Deisseroth said.

Oscillations, Dopamine and Reward Learning

In the Science paper, published online on April 23, Dr. Deisseroth led a team from Stanford and the University of California-San Francisco in investigating the effect of controlling the oscillations of neurons that emit the brain chemical dopamine. The group, made up of neuroscientists and bioengineering and psychiatry researchers, wanted to see if varying the oscillations led freely-behaving mice to sense varying levels of reward.

To conduct the experiment, they optogenetically engineered dopamine neurons in a specific area of the brains of the mice. Then they placed the mice into a box with three chambers in a row. At first, none of the mice had a predictable preference for which chamber to occupy. The researchers then exposed them to two days of conditioning, in which their engineered dopamine neurons were exposed to high-frequency pulses of light while in a chamber on one end, and low-frequency pulses while in the chamber on the other end. That is, the mice were split into two groups in which the different stimuli were associated with opposite ends of the box.

At the end of the experiment, the mice were placed in the middle chamber and exposed to no further light pulses. Each of the mice preferred to return to whichever chamber it was in when its dopamine neurons were subjected to the high-frequency light pulses, indicating that firing dopamine neurons at high-frequency rhythm correlates with stronger reward learning.

"We tested different rhythms in the dopamine neurons and we found that lower-frequency rhythms were much less effective, but the high-frequency bursts were powerfully effective in giving rise to this behavioral effect of reward," Dr. Deisseroth said. "Understanding more about these dopamine neurons has implications not only for drugs of abuse that directly access these feelings of reward, but also for depression, because in depressed people, one of the most prominent and debilitating symptoms is the inability to enjoy things."

In some sense, the papers suggest that people who aren't thinking clearly or feeling happy might just be out of step - their brain cells quite literally don't have rhythm.

(This article was adapted with permission from Stanford University Medical Center).

Add a CommentComments

There are no comments yet. Be the first one and get the conversation started!

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy

We value and respect our HERWriters' experiences, but everyone is different. Many of our writers are speaking from personal experience, and what's worked for them may not work for you. Their articles are not a substitute for medical advice, although we hope you can gain knowledge from their insight.