Please be patient while waiting for a response - we guarantee answers within 24 hours. Please post only once.
I'm sure you have read many times on our site that there is zero risk of pregnancy in these cases and nobody has ever returned to say they were indeed pregnant. There was no ejaculation and no sex. Pre-ejaculate itself does not contain any sperm. Sperm may be inside the urethra if a man ejaculated recently and did not urinate since. If he urinated since he last ejaculated, there is no sperm at all. Pregnancy is very uncommon from pre-ejaculate and the urethra would have to contain sperm at the same time. A woman would also have to be ovulating and engage in unprotected intercourse with ejaculation. This did not happen.
Best,
Susan
Comment Reply
Hello Francek
Thank you for writing!
Please be patient while waiting for a response - we guarantee answers within 24 hours. Please post only once.
I'm sure you have read many times on our site that there is zero risk of pregnancy in these cases and nobody has ever returned to say they were indeed pregnant. There was no ejaculation and no sex. Pre-ejaculate itself does not contain any sperm. Sperm may be inside the urethra if a man ejaculated recently and did not urinate since. If he urinated since he last ejaculated, there is no sperm at all. Pregnancy is very uncommon from pre-ejaculate and the urethra would have to contain sperm at the same time. A woman would also have to be ovulating and engage in unprotected intercourse with ejaculation. This did not happen.
July 25, 2018 - 10:50amBest,
Susan
This Comment
Reply