A literature review is exactly that, a review of RESEARCH. Not that hard to understand. You may not like the research that was reviewed, but nonetheless it was done by doctors and scientists. It seems to me that if a doctor or scientist brings out a study that is in favour of vaccines, you think they are great, yet if they come to different conclusions, they are suddenly a 'pseudoscientist' or fraudulant. That is hardly a scientific attitude. When one discusses fish or genetics or IVF or age of parents, one never has this much negativity.
Comment Reply
A literature review is exactly that, a review of RESEARCH. Not that hard to understand. You may not like the research that was reviewed, but nonetheless it was done by doctors and scientists. It seems to me that if a doctor or scientist brings out a study that is in favour of vaccines, you think they are great, yet if they come to different conclusions, they are suddenly a 'pseudoscientist' or fraudulant. That is hardly a scientific attitude. When one discusses fish or genetics or IVF or age of parents, one never has this much negativity.
September 12, 2011 - 2:39amThis Comment
Reply