We appreciate you visiting EmpowHER, but you must be logged in to view this page. If you are already a member, please log in here. If you are not a member yet, please fill out the form to start your free membership today.
Anonymous(reply to Anonymous)
No, there really isn't that possibility. The results--the basic facts--reported in Wakefield's anti-MMR paper clearly do not match the clinical records taken during the study. Diagnoses, histories, and descriptions of the children involved were changed. This is, by definition, dishonest.
Comment Reply
No, there really isn't that possibility. The results--the basic facts--reported in Wakefield's anti-MMR paper clearly do not match the clinical records taken during the study. Diagnoses, histories, and descriptions of the children involved were changed. This is, by definition, dishonest.
May 26, 2010 - 4:34pmThis Comment
Reply